AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X with 288 GB HBM3e and 19,456 cores vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X outperforms AMD Radeon R9 280X2 by 2,588.17% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

AMD Radeon R9 280X2

3.7

AMD Radeon R9 280X2

3.7

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X значительно превосходит Radeon R9 280X2 по многим параметрам. MI325X имеет гораздо больше ядер (19456 против 2048), больше памяти (288 ГБ HBM3e против 3 ГБ GDDR5) и гораздо большую пропускную способность (10.3 TB/s против 288 GB/s). Также MI325X обладает более высокой производительностью в FP32 (81.72 TFLOPS против 4.096 TFLOPS) и TDP (1000 Вт против 375 Вт). Этот GPU предназначен для вычислений и больших данных, тогда как R9 280X2 лучше подходит для игр и базовых вычислений.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +9,500% 288 ГБ
3 GB ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
288.0 GB/s ×2 (576 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 653.7 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,895% 81.72 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +7,880% 81.72 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +850% 19,456
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +5% 1,000
950

Boost Clock

🔥 +110% 2,100
1,000

Memory Clock

🔥 +68% 2,525
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1400 W
🔥 -46% 750 W

Power Connector

None 3x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

1000 W
🔥 -62% 375 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +850% 1,216
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
768 KB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (Dummy)

3 596 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 946 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

22.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

6 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2024 No

Display Outputs

No outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying