AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT

Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X with 192 GB HBM3 and 19,456 cores vs PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X outperforms PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT by 1,470.95% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X

94.1

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X

94.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT

6.0

PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT

6.0

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X лучше по пропускной способности памяти (10.3 TB/s против 256.0 GB/s) и общему количеству ядер (19456 против 2048). Он также предназначен для более сложных вычислений и имеет гораздо большую TDP (750 Вт против 160 Вт), что делает его более мощным для научных вычислений и машинного обучения. PowerColor Hellhound RX 6600 XT больше подходит для игр и базовых вычислений из-за меньшего энергопотребления и меньшей производительности в вычислениях.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +2,300% 192 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

HBM3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
256.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +2,978% 653.7 TFLOPS
21.24 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +669% 81.72 TFLOPS
10.62 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +12,211% 81.72 TFLOPS
0.6638 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +850% 19,456
2,048

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 RDNA 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000
🔥 +100% 2,000

Boost Clock

2,100
🔥 +23% 2,593

Memory Clock

🔥 +26% 2,525
2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1150 W
🔥 -61% 450 W

Power Connector

None 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

750 W
🔥 -79% 160 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +850% 1,216
128

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 2 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

1 983 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

1 740 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 057 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (UNSET)

30.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

34.8 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

232.9 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

5 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Dec. 6, 2023 July 30, 2021

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying