AMD FirePro W4300 vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of AMD FirePro W4300 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 768 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms AMD FirePro W4300 by 695.24% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD FirePro W4300

1.5

AMD FirePro W4300

1.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

96.00 GB/s 559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.4285 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,276% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0893 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,653% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

768
🔥 +433% 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 2.0 Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,150

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,400

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 +46% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -55% 250 W
550 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -78% 50 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

48
🔥 +433% 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 16 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Dec. 1, 2015 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying