AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of AMD FirePro S9300 X2 with 4 GB HBM and 4,096 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms AMD FirePro S9300 X2 by 46.68% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD FirePro S9300 X2

8.0

AMD FirePro S9300 X2

8.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB ×2 (8 ГБ)
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s ×2 (1024 GB/s) 559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит ×2 (8192 бит) 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

7.987 TFLOPS
🔥 +146% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.4992 TFLOPS
🔥 +392% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096 ×2 (8192)
🔥 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 3.0 Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,150

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,400

Memory Clock

500
🔥 +337% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

700 W
🔥 -21% 550 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

300 W
🔥 -25% 225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

256 ×2 (512)
🔥 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +700% 16 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

March 31, 2016 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying