AFOX RTX 5090 vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of AFOX RTX 5090 with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AFOX RTX 5090 outperforms ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB by 276.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AFOX RTX 5090

44.0

AFOX RTX 5090

44.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 32 ГБ
16 GB

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +167% 104.8 TFLOPS
39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +433% 104.8 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

1.637 TFLOPS
🔥 +50% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +431% 21,760
4,096

RT Cores

🔥 +431% 170
32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

12.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

2,017
🔥 +7% 2,150

Boost Clock

🔥 2,407
2,400

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 +25% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -42% 550 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -61% 225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +166% 680
256

ROP

🔥 +431% 170
32

L2 Cache

🔥 +500% 96 MB
16 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying