AFOX RTX 5090 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

Comparison of AFOX RTX 5090 with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X with 288 GB HBM3e and 19,456 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X outperforms AFOX RTX 5090 by 127.07% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AFOX RTX 5090

44.0

AFOX RTX 5090

44.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

32 GB
🔥 +800% 288 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR7 HBM3e

Memory Bandwidth

1.79 TB/s
🔥 +475% 10.3 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 8,192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

104.8 TFLOPS
🔥 +524% 653.7 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +28% 104.8 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

1.637 TFLOPS
🔥 +4,892% 81.72 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +12% 21,760
19,456

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 CDNA 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

12.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +102% 2,017
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +15% 2,407
2,100

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 +44% 2,525

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -32% 950 W
1400 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

TDP/TGP

🔥 -42% 575 W
1000 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

680
🔥 +79% 1,216

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 +500% 96 MB
16 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (Dummy)

3 596 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 946 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

22.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

6 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot OAM Module

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Oct. 12, 2024

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying