Adlink RTX A500 Embedded vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of Adlink RTX A500 Embedded with 4 GB GDDR6 and 2,048 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Adlink RTX A500 Embedded by 255.32% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Adlink RTX A500 Embedded

3.3

Adlink RTX A500 Embedded

3.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

96.00 GB/s 559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

64 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

6.971 TFLOPS
🔥 +464% 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

6.971 TFLOPS
🔥 +182% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1089 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,157% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,048
🔥 +100% 4,096

RT Cores

16
🔥 +100% 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 16
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.6 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

952
🔥 +126% 2,150

Boost Clock

1,702
🔥 +41% 2,400

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 +46% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 550 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -87% 30 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

64
🔥 +300% 256

ROP

16
🔥 +100% 32

L2 Cache

🔥 2 MB
16 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

March 30, 2022 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying