Abaco XMCGA8 XMC vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of Abaco XMCGA8 XMC with 2 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms Abaco XMCGA8 XMC by 2,745.05% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco XMCGA8 XMC

0.9

Abaco XMCGA8 XMC

0.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 GB
🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

72.00 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.8 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,336% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.05 TFLOPS
🔥 +19,392% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

640
🔥 +980% 6,912

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

575
🔥 +101% 1,155

Boost Clock

625
🔥 +126% 1,410

Memory Clock

1,125
🔥 +42% 1,593

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 800 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

🔥 -91% 37 W
400 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

40
🔥 +980% 432

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 40 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

Jan. 25, 2014 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

1x VGA
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying