Abaco MCS1000 3U VPX vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

Comparison of Abaco MCS1000 3U VPX with 2 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX with 8 GB GDDR6X and 3,840 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA CMP 70HX outperforms Abaco MCS1000 3U VPX by 742.86% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco MCS1000 3U VPX

0.9

Abaco MCS1000 3U VPX

0.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7

NVIDIA CMP 70HX

7.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 GB
🔥 +300% 8 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6X

Memory Bandwidth

72.00 GB/s 608.3 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 10.71 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.8 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,239% 10.71 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.05 TFLOPS
🔥 +235% 0.1674 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

640
🔥 +500% 3,840

RT Cores

No
🔥 30

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 30

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x4

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

575
🔥 +137% 1,365

Boost Clock

625
🔥 +123% 1,395

Memory Clock

1,125
🔥 +6% 1,188

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 200 W

Power Connector

None 1x 12-pin

TDP/TGP

37 W unknown

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

40
🔥 +200% 120

ROP

No
🔥 30

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 25, 2014 March 11, 2021

Display Outputs

1x VGA
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying