Abaco GVC1001 vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of Abaco GVC1001 with 16 GB LPDDR4X and 512 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Abaco GVC1001 by 464.73% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco GVC1001

2.1

Abaco GVC1001

2.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB
🔥 16 ГБ

Memory Type

LPDDR4X GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

136.5 GB/s 559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

2.82 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,294% 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.41 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,294% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.705 TFLOPS
🔥 +249% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +700% 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Volta Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

8 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.2 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

854
🔥 +152% 2,150

Boost Clock

1,377
🔥 +74% 2,400

Memory Clock

2,133
🔥 +3% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 550 W

Power Connector

No 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -87% 30 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +700% 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 16 MB

Additional

Slots

IGP Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 13, 2018 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying