Abaco GRA116S 3U VPX vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

Comparison of Abaco GRA116S 3U VPX with 16 GB GDDR6 and 5,888 cores vs ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Abaco GRA116S 3U VPX by 28.32% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco GRA116S 3U VPX

9.1

Abaco GRA116S 3U VPX

9.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB 16 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

384.0 GB/s 559.9 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

14.31 TFLOPS
🔥 +175% 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

14.31 TFLOPS
🔥 +37% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.2236 TFLOPS
🔥 +999% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +44% 5,888
4,096

RT Cores

🔥 +44% 46
32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 46
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.6 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

510
🔥 +322% 2,150

Boost Clock

1,215
🔥 +98% 2,400

Memory Clock

1,500
🔥 +46% 2,187

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 550 W

Power Connector

None 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -64% 80 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

184
🔥 +39% 256

ROP

🔥 +44% 46
32

L2 Cache

🔥 4 MB
16 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

March 30, 2022 Oct. 12, 2022

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0

Renting is cheaper than buying