Abaco GRA115V 3U VPX vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparison of Abaco GRA115V 3U VPX with 6 GB GDDR6 and 1,920 cores vs NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms Abaco GRA115V 3U VPX by 500.7% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco GRA115V 3U VPX

4.3

Abaco GRA115V 3U VPX

4.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

6 GB
🔥 +1,233% 80 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM2e

Memory Bandwidth

336.0 GB/s
🔥 2.04 TB/s

Memory Bus Width

192 бит 5,120 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

10.6 TFLOPS
🔥 +636% 77.97 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No
🔥 311.84 TFLOPS

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No
🔥 155.92

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.299 TFLOPS
🔥 +268% 19.49 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1656 TFLOPS
🔥 +5,785% 9.746 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,920
🔥 +260% 6,912

RT Cores

30 No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

30
🔥 +260% 108

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 8.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

945
🔥 +22% 1,155

Boost Clock

1,380
🔥 +2% 1,410

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 1,593

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 800 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

🔥 -80% 80 W
400 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

120
🔥 +260% 432

ROP

30 No

L2 Cache

3 MB
🔥 +1,233% 40 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

May 27, 2019 Aug. 11, 2022

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying