Abaco GRA115S 3U VPX vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Comparison of Abaco GRA115S 3U VPX with 6 GB GDDR6 and 1,920 cores vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF with 24 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms Abaco GRA115S 3U VPX by 207.89% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Abaco GRA115S 3U VPX

4.3

Abaco GRA115S 3U VPX

4.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

6 GB
🔥 +300% 24 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

336.0 GB/s 432.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

192 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

10.6 TFLOPS
🔥 +142% 25.66 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.299 TFLOPS
🔥 +384% 25.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1656 TFLOPS
🔥 +142% 0.401 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,920
🔥 +367% 8,960

RT Cores

30
🔥 +133% 70

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Turing Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

30
🔥 +133% 70

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

7.5
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

945
🔥 577

Boost Clock

1,380
🔥 +4% 1,432

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 1,125

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 250 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

80 W
🔥 -12% 70 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

120
🔥 +133% 280

ROP

30
🔥 +133% 70

L2 Cache

3 MB
🔥 +1,500% 48 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

May 27, 2019 Aug. 11, 2025

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying